ENGR 3330 Grading Sheet
Final Design Review
Students’ Names:______________________________________________________
Advisor/Coordinator____________________________________________________
Material for the design review has been updated as required and meets professional standards for detail, clarity, and completeness.
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
|
Little/None(F) |
Minimal (C-) |
Adequate (C) |
Complete (B) |
High (B+/A-) |
Very High (A) |
|
0 |
3/0.5/0.25 |
3.6/0.6/0.3 |
4.8/0.8/0.4 |
5.4/0.9/0.45 |
6.0/1/0.5 |
Comments on Shortcomings
The student is able to show how key criteria for success, technical issues, and constraints, have been addressed in the detailed design. The student is able to describe the alternatives that were evaluated and show why those selected were preferred over the others in terms of addressing criteria for success and constraints
.ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
|
Little/None(F) |
Minimal (C-) |
Adequate (C) |
Complete (B) |
High (B+/A-) |
Very High (A) |
|
0 |
3/0.5/0.25 |
3.6/0.6/0.3 |
4.8/0.8/0.4 |
5.4/0.9/0.45 |
6.0/1/0.5 |
Comments on Shortcomings
The student used good time management skills to execute the plan and complete the project.
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
|
Little/None(F) |
Minimal (C-) |
Adequate (C) |
Complete (B) |
High (B+/A-) |
Very High (A) |
|
0 |
3/0.5/0.25 |
3.6/0.6/0.3 |
4.8/0.8/0.4 |
5.4/0.9/0.45 |
6.0/1/0.5 |
Comments on Shortcomings
The student has adequately defined the test scenarios used to test the project, related the test scenarios to the criteria for success.
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
|
Little/None(F) |
Minimal (C-) |
Adequate (C) |
Complete (B) |
High (B+/A-) |
Very High (A) |
|
0 |
3/0.5/0.25 |
3.6/0.6/0.3 |
4.8/0.8/0.4 |
5.4/0.9/0.45 |
6.0/1/0.5 |
Comments on Shortcomings
Adequate test data has been acquired and evaluated to permit the assessment of the project’s performance against the criteria for success and contraints.
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
|
Little/None(F) |
Minimal (C-) |
Adequate (C) |
Complete (B) |
High (B+/A-) |
Very High (A) |
|
0 |
3/0.5/0.25 |
3.6/0.6/0.3 |
4.8/0.8/0.4 |
5.4/0.9/0.45 |
6.0/1/0.5 |
Comments on Shortcomings
Note: The format for the points in the tables above is:
ADVISORS/ PRIMARY COORDINATORS/ OTHER COORDINATORS