ENGR 3330 Grading Sheet

Final Report

Students’ Names:______________________________________________________

Advisor/Coordinator____________________________________________________

To what level does this report exhibit correct English grammar, word usage, and spelling? To what level does this report exhibit logical sentence paragraph and overall structure? To what level does this report demonstrate a style that includes handling, labeling, and use of figures, tables, pagination, and references which is consistent with that in the professional engineering workplace?

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

Little/None(F)

Minimal (C-)

Adequate (C)

Complete (B)

High (B+/A-)

Very High (A)

0

2.0/0.5/0.25

2.4/0.6/0.3

3.2/0.8/0.4

3.6/0.9/0.45

4.0/1/0.5

Comments on Shortcomings

(31) To what extent did the student incorporate the customer's perspective into the problem statement and performance criteria? The values and practical needs of the customer include, as appropriate, cost, reliability and environmental friendliness.

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

Little/None(F)

Minimal (C-)

Adequate (C)

Complete (B)

High (B+/A-)

Very High (A)

0

2.5/0.5/0.25

3/0.6/0.3

4/0.8/0.4

4.5/0.9/0.45

5.0/1/0.5

Comments on Shortcomings

(37) To what level has the student demonstrated that they can implement project planning skills including: time management, task definition; scheduling; resource use; general project organization. Do these skills reflect an understanding of constraints typical of the engineering environment?

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

Little/None(F)

Minimal (C-)

Adequate (C)

Complete (B)

High (B+/A-)

Very High (A)

0

2.5/0.5/0.25

3/0.6/0.3

4/0.8/0.4

4.5/0.9/0.45

5.0/1/0.5

Comments on Shortcomings

 

(37) To what level has the student generated alternative solutions that address the customer’s needs? To what degree was the choice of solutions driven by quantitative analysis of the objectives and constraints? Have all relevant issues have been addressed. What is the overall technical quality of the project?

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

Little/None(F)

Minimal (C-)

Adequate (C)

Complete (B)

High (B+/A-)

Very High (A)

0

4/0.5/0.25

4.8/0.6/0.3

6.4/0.8/0.4

7.2/0.9/0.45

8/1/0.5

Comments on Shortcomings

 

(37) Has the student fabricated and tested the design? Do the tests evaluate and validate the design against the quantitative objectives and criteria for success?

ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

Little/None(F)

Minimal (C-)

Adequate (C)

Complete (B)

High (B+/A-)

Very High (A)

0

5/0.5/0.25

6/0.6/0.3

8/0.8/0.4

9/0.9/0.45

10/1/0.5

Comments on Shortcomings

 

Note: The format for the points in the tables above is:

ADVISORS/ PRIMARY COORDINATORS/ OTHER COORDINATORS